Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Disallowance of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and Sustainable Development (SD) expenses. Following the precedents established in the assessee's own cases and the case of PEC Ltd., it was held that the assessee company was obligated to incur CSR and SD expenses due to specific guidelines from the Government of India. Consequently, the expenditure incurred during the relevant assessment years of 2011-12 and 2012-13 was considered wholly and exclusively for the purposes of the assessee's business. Therefore, the deduction claimed by the assessee for both assessment years was deemed allowable, with the decision favoring the assessee.
Disallowance of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and Sustainable Development (SD) expenses. Following the precedents established in the assessee's own cases and the case of PEC Ltd., it was held that the assessee company was obligated to incur CSR and SD expenses due to specific guidelines from the Government of India. Consequently, the expenditure incurred during the relevant assessment years of 2011-12 and 2012-13 was considered wholly and exclusively for the purposes of the assessee's business. Therefore, the deduction claimed by the assessee for both assessment years was deemed allowable, with the decision favoring the assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.