Governmental authority status supports construction-service exemption, while pre-cutoff contract and stamp-duty compliance requires verification on re...
Automated Free Sale and Commerce Certificates enable paperless processing while retaining risk-based manual verification for selected exporter applica...
Employee stock-shortage penalties do not constitute consideration for services, preventing GST collection under Schedule II in employment relationship...
Non-compliance with conditions imposed u/s 129(e) of Customs Act, 1962 led to rejection of appeal. The High Court held that writ petitions challenging final order of CEGAT are maintainable in appropriate cases heard by Division Bench, despite availability of statutory remedy u/s 35G of Central Excise Act. These petitions were treated as mercy petitions without involving any question of law. To balance interests, the impugned orders were set aside on condition of remitting Rs. 15 lakhs per appeal within four weeks.
Non-compliance with conditions imposed u/s 129(e) of Customs Act, 1962 led to rejection of appeal. The High Court held that writ petitions challenging final order of CEGAT are maintainable in appropriate cases heard by Division Bench, despite availability of statutory remedy u/s 35G of Central Excise Act. These petitions were treated as mercy petitions without involving any question of law. To balance interests, the impugned orders were set aside on condition of remitting Rs. 15 lakhs per appeal within four weeks.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
