Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
International transaction benchmarking restricts transfer pricing adjustments to associated-enterprise dealings, while functional comparability govern...
Joint development agreements defer taxable transfer where possession lacks part performance, while completed flats determine consideration and exempti...
Passenger baggage re-export requires true declaration and cannot be granted indirectly through discretionary redemption of undeclared prohibited goods...
The case involves a violation of the principles of natural justice. There was a failure to provide a proper opportunity for a hearing before passing an adverse order u/s 74 of the Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017. The court observed that each monthly return filed is separate, and a distinct order can be passed for assessment or penalty, even if the parties, invoices, or ITC claimed appear to be the same. The High Court dismissed the writ petition as misconceived.
The case involves a violation of the principles of natural justice. There was a failure to provide a proper opportunity for a hearing before passing an adverse order u/s 74 of the Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017. The court observed that each monthly return filed is separate, and a distinct order can be passed for assessment or penalty, even if the parties, invoices, or ITC claimed appear to be the same. The High Court dismissed the writ petition as misconceived.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4801
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
