Specialized Investment Fund distribution now requires dedicated certification, while transitional recognition preserves existing qualified distributor...
Overlapping GST proceedings require Central and State authorities to designate one competent authority for coordinated adjudication of the same matter...
Composite healthcare supplies retain exemption when patient care is the contract's essential character, despite payment through an implementing agency...
Petitioner challenged denial of input tax credit (ITC) on manpower supply services received during 2017-18 to 2022-23, citing Circular No. 211/5/2024-GST. Court held petitioner entitled to ITC and cannot be deprived or liable for interest due to belated claim, as per circular. Circular supports petitioner's claim, binding on respondents as per KP Varghese judgment. However, as circular issued during pendency, respondent didn't have its benefit earlier. Petition disposed, directing respondent to consider petitioner's objections within three weeks, bearing in mind circular and pass orders accordingly. Petitioner granted liberty to file objections to show cause notice.
Petitioner challenged denial of input tax credit (ITC) on manpower supply services received during 2017-18 to 2022-23, citing Circular No. 211/5/2024-GST. Court held petitioner entitled to ITC and cannot be deprived or liable for interest due to belated claim, as per circular. Circular supports petitioner's claim, binding on respondents as per KP Varghese judgment. However, as circular issued during pendency, respondent didn't have its benefit earlier. Petition disposed, directing respondent to consider petitioner's objections within three weeks, bearing in mind circular and pass orders accordingly. Petitioner granted liberty to file objections to show cause notice.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
