Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
The High Court set aside the impugned order and remanded the matter back to the respondent authority to pass a fresh order. This was subject to the condition that the petitioner deposits 10% of the disputed tax amount within 30 days as security. The case pertained to discrepancies between the GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B returns filed by the petitioner. The petitioner had already paid tax but sought an opportunity to be heard and expressed willingness to deposit an additional 10% of the disputed tax from the electronic cash register as security.
The High Court set aside the impugned order and remanded the matter back to the respondent authority to pass a fresh order. This was subject to the condition that the petitioner deposits 10% of the disputed tax amount within 30 days as security. The case pertained to discrepancies between the GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B returns filed by the petitioner. The petitioner had already paid tax but sought an opportunity to be heard and expressed willingness to deposit an additional 10% of the disputed tax from the electronic cash register as security.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
