Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Insolvency professional agency governance rules amended to add nominee directors, tighten independent director eligibility, and regulate managing dire...
The High Court set aside the impugned order and remanded the matter back to the respondent authority to pass a fresh order. This was subject to the condition that the petitioner deposits 10% of the disputed tax amount within 30 days as security. The case pertained to discrepancies between the GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B returns filed by the petitioner. The petitioner had already paid tax but sought an opportunity to be heard and expressed willingness to deposit an additional 10% of the disputed tax from the electronic cash register as security.
The High Court set aside the impugned order and remanded the matter back to the respondent authority to pass a fresh order. This was subject to the condition that the petitioner deposits 10% of the disputed tax amount within 30 days as security. The case pertained to discrepancies between the GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B returns filed by the petitioner. The petitioner had already paid tax but sought an opportunity to be heard and expressed willingness to deposit an additional 10% of the disputed tax from the electronic cash register as security.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4821 
Join Channel 
