Purposive interpretation of residential house exemption: unregistered purchase agreement alone does not defeat relief, but investment must be verified...
Page of 4817
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3041 to 3060 of 96333 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The High Court set aside the impugned order and remanded the matter back to the respondent authority to pass a fresh order. This was subject to the condition that the petitioner deposits 10% of the disputed tax amount within 30 days as security. The case pertained to discrepancies between the GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B returns filed by the petitioner. The petitioner had already paid tax but sought an opportunity to be heard and expressed willingness to deposit an additional 10% of the disputed tax from the electronic cash register as security.
The High Court set aside the impugned order and remanded the matter back to the respondent authority to pass a fresh order. This was subject to the condition that the petitioner deposits 10% of the disputed tax amount within 30 days as security. The case pertained to discrepancies between the GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B returns filed by the petitioner. The petitioner had already paid tax but sought an opportunity to be heard and expressed willingness to deposit an additional 10% of the disputed tax from the electronic cash register as security.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
