Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The provisions of Section 56(2)(vii)(b) read with Section 50C cannot be invoked as the difference between the Fair Market Value (FMV) determined by the District Valuation Officer (DVO) and the stated purchase consideration is 5.32%, which is less than 10% of the stated sale consideration. In light of the proviso to Section 56(2)(vii)(b) read with the third proviso to Section 50C, which has been held applicable retrospectively with effect from 01/04/2003, if the difference between the stated consideration and the stamp duty valuation is less than 10% of the stated consideration, Section 50C will not be applicable. Since the difference is admittedly less than 10% in this case, Section 50C will have no application, and the assessee's appeal is allowed.
The provisions of Section 56(2)(vii)(b) read with Section 50C cannot be invoked as the difference between the Fair Market Value (FMV) determined by the District Valuation Officer (DVO) and the stated purchase consideration is 5.32%, which is less than 10% of the stated sale consideration. In light of the proviso to Section 56(2)(vii)(b) read with the third proviso to Section 50C, which has been held applicable retrospectively with effect from 01/04/2003, if the difference between the stated consideration and the stamp duty valuation is less than 10% of the stated consideration, Section 50C will not be applicable. Since the difference is admittedly less than 10% in this case, Section 50C will have no application, and the assessee's appeal is allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
