Online bond platforms may offer overseas-regulated products and tax-specific bonds subject to disclosures, compliance safeguards and revised complianc...
Corporate guarantee valuation permits actual ascertainable commission while barring retroactive application and extended-period penalties for bona fid...
Proper-officer jurisdiction under UPGST penalty provisions upheld; participation on merits prevents bypassing the statutory appellate remedy through w...
Transitioned CENVAT credit may validly satisfy mandatory pre-deposit requirements for legacy service tax appeals through Electronic Credit Ledger debi...
Building-plan sanction charges require statutory authority; unauthorised fees and GST were quashed, while labour cess must follow prescribed collectio...
Pure-agent exclusion fails where hotel booking facilitators receive third-party services themselves, making entire customer consideration taxable as r...
Rejection of the petitioner's application for revocation of the cancellation order of GST registration. The key points are: the show cause notice (SCN) did not propose retrospective cancellation, violating natural justice principles. Section 29(2) of the CGST/DGST Act empowers retrospective cancellation, but it must be based on cogent reasons, not whimsically or arbitrarily. The impugned cancellation order lacked reasoning for retrospective cancellation. The High Court directed restoring the petitioner's GST registration for 30 days to file returns, after which the proper officer may consider further action if necessary. The summary covers the legal issues, statutory provisions, and the court's directions concisely.
Rejection of the petitioner's application for revocation of the cancellation order of GST registration. The key points are: the show cause notice (SCN) did not propose retrospective cancellation, violating natural justice principles. Section 29(2) of the CGST/DGST Act empowers retrospective cancellation, but it must be based on cogent reasons, not whimsically or arbitrarily. The impugned cancellation order lacked reasoning for retrospective cancellation. The High Court directed restoring the petitioner's GST registration for 30 days to file returns, after which the proper officer may consider further action if necessary. The summary covers the legal issues, statutory provisions, and the court's directions concisely.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4798
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
