Opportunity to respond to jurisdictional reports is mandatory before customs settlement duty enhancement; connected applications require consistent ad...
Specific customs headings for scaffolding components prevail over general classification, invalidating misclassification proceedings and enabling with...
Liquidator appointment under Section 34 requires consideration of creditor recommendations, valid professional authorisation, and preservation of vali...
Income-tax exemption for specified regulatory fees and government grants applies subject to non-commercial activity and continuing compliance conditio...
Digital accessibility audit and remediation deadlines extended, while all other disability-compliance obligations for regulated entities remain unchan...
Page of 4803
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
621 to 640 of 96047 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Rejection of the petitioner's application for revocation of the cancellation order of GST registration. The key points are: the show cause notice (SCN) did not propose retrospective cancellation, violating natural justice principles. Section 29(2) of the CGST/DGST Act empowers retrospective cancellation, but it must be based on cogent reasons, not whimsically or arbitrarily. The impugned cancellation order lacked reasoning for retrospective cancellation. The High Court directed restoring the petitioner's GST registration for 30 days to file returns, after which the proper officer may consider further action if necessary. The summary covers the legal issues, statutory provisions, and the court's directions concisely.
Rejection of the petitioner's application for revocation of the cancellation order of GST registration. The key points are: the show cause notice (SCN) did not propose retrospective cancellation, violating natural justice principles. Section 29(2) of the CGST/DGST Act empowers retrospective cancellation, but it must be based on cogent reasons, not whimsically or arbitrarily. The impugned cancellation order lacked reasoning for retrospective cancellation. The High Court directed restoring the petitioner's GST registration for 30 days to file returns, after which the proper officer may consider further action if necessary. The summary covers the legal issues, statutory provisions, and the court's directions concisely.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
