Commercial vehicle depreciation, scientifically determined warranty provisions and exempt-income disallowances were resolved in favour of the taxpayer...
Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Petitioner challenged the show-cause notice (SCN) in Form GST DRC-01, alleging that respondents sought to levy GST at 28% instead of the prevalent 18% rate paid since 2017. The court held that mere issuance of the SCN to the petitioner and not to counterparts cannot be deemed unlawful. Writ jurisdiction cannot be invoked solely based on the SCN issuance, as the petitioner has the right to file a reply and be heard before any order is passed. Furthermore, any order passed by the authorities is appealable under the CGST Act. Consequently, the writ petition lacked merit and was dismissed.
Petitioner challenged the show-cause notice (SCN) in Form GST DRC-01, alleging that respondents sought to levy GST at 28% instead of the prevalent 18% rate paid since 2017. The court held that mere issuance of the SCN to the petitioner and not to counterparts cannot be deemed unlawful. Writ jurisdiction cannot be invoked solely based on the SCN issuance, as the petitioner has the right to file a reply and be heard before any order is passed. Furthermore, any order passed by the authorities is appealable under the CGST Act. Consequently, the writ petition lacked merit and was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
