Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Petitioner approached the Court seeking direction to respondent authorities to decide application for GST refund for December 2017 and January 2018, which was denied due to technical issues in GSTN portal. Court directed respondents to consider petitioner's representation within four weeks, providing opportunity of hearing, and place findings on record. Matter adjourned to specified date, with permission for direct service on respondents.
Petitioner approached the Court seeking direction to respondent authorities to decide application for GST refund for December 2017 and January 2018, which was denied due to technical issues in GSTN portal. Court directed respondents to consider petitioner's representation within four weeks, providing opportunity of hearing, and place findings on record. Matter adjourned to specified date, with permission for direct service on respondents.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4800
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
