Overlapping GST proceedings require Central and State authorities to designate one competent authority for coordinated adjudication of the same matter...
Composite healthcare supplies retain exemption when patient care is the contract's essential character, despite payment through an implementing agency...
Receipt of immovable property requires actual possession or enjoyment; redevelopment allotments exchanged for tenancy rights fall outside deemed incom...
The court held that if the rate of duty drawback under Column A and Column B is the same, then the refund of IGST has to be ordered even if the party selects Column A, as selecting Column A does not result in any double benefit. In the present case, the petitioner had voluntarily selected Column A and claimed higher duty drawback. The court directed the respondents to grant refund of IGST paid on exported goods after deducting the differential amount of duty drawback, along with 7% interest from the date of the shipping bill till the date of actual refund. The petition was allowed.
The court held that if the rate of duty drawback under Column A and Column B is the same, then the refund of IGST has to be ordered even if the party selects Column A, as selecting Column A does not result in any double benefit. In the present case, the petitioner had voluntarily selected Column A and claimed higher duty drawback. The court directed the respondents to grant refund of IGST paid on exported goods after deducting the differential amount of duty drawback, along with 7% interest from the date of the shipping bill till the date of actual refund. The petition was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
