Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
The court held that if the rate of duty drawback under Column A and Column B is the same, then the refund of IGST has to be ordered even if the party selects Column A, as selecting Column A does not result in any double benefit. In the present case, the petitioner had voluntarily selected Column A and claimed higher duty drawback. The court directed the respondents to grant refund of IGST paid on exported goods after deducting the differential amount of duty drawback, along with 7% interest from the date of the shipping bill till the date of actual refund. The petition was allowed.
The court held that if the rate of duty drawback under Column A and Column B is the same, then the refund of IGST has to be ordered even if the party selects Column A, as selecting Column A does not result in any double benefit. In the present case, the petitioner had voluntarily selected Column A and claimed higher duty drawback. The court directed the respondents to grant refund of IGST paid on exported goods after deducting the differential amount of duty drawback, along with 7% interest from the date of the shipping bill till the date of actual refund. The petition was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4798
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
