Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The High Court held that once a resolution plan is approved u/s 31(1) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC), only the debts specified in the resolution plan remain payable. All dues not included in the resolution plan stand extinguished, and no proceedings can be initiated or continued regarding any claim for such dues. The impugned reassessment proceedings pertaining to the assessment year 2016-17 relate to the period prior to the approval of the resolution plan and thus cannot be continued or initiated after the plan's approval. The resolution plan was approved on May 6, 2020, and any attempt to reassess the petitioner-assessee for the assessment year 2016-17 would directly conflict with the law declared in Ghanshyam Mishra, prohibiting the continuation of existing proceedings and initiation of new proceedings related to operations prior to the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) after the resolution plan's approval. Consequently, the reassessment proceedings, predating the CIRP and relating to the period before the resolution plan's approval, stand extinguished. The petitioner-assessee has begun on a clean slate under new ownership and management after completing the CIRP, and the writ petition was quashed.
The High Court held that once a resolution plan is approved u/s 31(1) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC), only the debts specified in the resolution plan remain payable. All dues not included in the resolution plan stand extinguished, and no proceedings can be initiated or continued regarding any claim for such dues. The impugned reassessment proceedings pertaining to the assessment year 2016-17 relate to the period prior to the approval of the resolution plan and thus cannot be continued or initiated after the plan's approval. The resolution plan was approved on May 6, 2020, and any attempt to reassess the petitioner-assessee for the assessment year 2016-17 would directly conflict with the law declared in Ghanshyam Mishra, prohibiting the continuation of existing proceedings and initiation of new proceedings related to operations prior to the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) after the resolution plan's approval. Consequently, the reassessment proceedings, predating the CIRP and relating to the period before the resolution plan's approval, stand extinguished. The petitioner-assessee has begun on a clean slate under new ownership and management after completing the CIRP, and the writ petition was quashed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
