Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The High Court ruled on the validity of an order passed u/s 144C(3) read with Section 144B. The petitioner had filed objections to the Draft Assessment Order before the Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP). Considering the objections filed before the DRP and the observations made in the Open Silicon Research case, the court held that the Assessment Order passed disregarding the objections requires interference. The Assessing Officer (AO) ought to have waited for the DRP's directions. The court allowed the petition, setting aside the order, with a direction to the AO to follow the DRP's directions and proceed accordingly, while the DRP would issue necessary directions considering the petitioner's objections.
The High Court ruled on the validity of an order passed u/s 144C(3) read with Section 144B. The petitioner had filed objections to the Draft Assessment Order before the Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP). Considering the objections filed before the DRP and the observations made in the Open Silicon Research case, the court held that the Assessment Order passed disregarding the objections requires interference. The Assessing Officer (AO) ought to have waited for the DRP's directions. The court allowed the petition, setting aside the order, with a direction to the AO to follow the DRP's directions and proceed accordingly, while the DRP would issue necessary directions considering the petitioner's objections.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
