Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Section 56(2)(viib) deals with the consideration received by a company for issue of shares at a premium. The assessee company issued equity shares at a premium, which was questioned by the tax authorities. The key points are: The assessee is entitled to modify the net asset value (NAV) to determine the fair market value (FMV) of shares, as per the Explanation to Section 56(2)(viib). The assessee produced a valuation report and market valuation of its subsidiary to substantiate the FMV. Reworking the subsidiary's value using methods like discounted cash flow (DCF) is permissible if the valuation is correctly established. The tax authorities erred in not allowing modification of NAV components. The assessee's approach to determine FMV based on the subsidiary's valuation is in line with Section 56(2)(viib). The ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal on this issue.
Section 56(2)(viib) deals with the consideration received by a company for issue of shares at a premium. The assessee company issued equity shares at a premium, which was questioned by the tax authorities. The key points are: The assessee is entitled to modify the net asset value (NAV) to determine the fair market value (FMV) of shares, as per the Explanation to Section 56(2)(viib). The assessee produced a valuation report and market valuation of its subsidiary to substantiate the FMV. Reworking the subsidiary's value using methods like discounted cash flow (DCF) is permissible if the valuation is correctly established. The tax authorities erred in not allowing modification of NAV components. The assessee's approach to determine FMV based on the subsidiary's valuation is in line with Section 56(2)(viib). The ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal on this issue.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
