Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The assessee dealt with a penny stock, and the Assessing Officer (AO) failed to conduct proper inquiry during reassessment proceedings. The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (PCIT) rightly invoked Section 263, as the AO did not ask for the demat account or make necessary inquiries regarding the penny stock transaction. Explanation 2 to Section 263 is applicable. The PCIT correctly set aside the reassessment order and directed the AO to pass a fresh order after examining the facts, as the AO merely accepted the assessee's contentions without thorough investigation. Once reassessment was initiated on grounds of dealing in manipulated penny stocks to generate bogus long-term capital gains/losses, the AO was obligated to conduct a detailed inquiry to unravel the truth behind the transaction. However, the AO made a superficial inquiry, necessitating the PCIT's intervention. The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the assessee's appeal.
The assessee dealt with a penny stock, and the Assessing Officer (AO) failed to conduct proper inquiry during reassessment proceedings. The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (PCIT) rightly invoked Section 263, as the AO did not ask for the demat account or make necessary inquiries regarding the penny stock transaction. Explanation 2 to Section 263 is applicable. The PCIT correctly set aside the reassessment order and directed the AO to pass a fresh order after examining the facts, as the AO merely accepted the assessee's contentions without thorough investigation. Once reassessment was initiated on grounds of dealing in manipulated penny stocks to generate bogus long-term capital gains/losses, the AO was obligated to conduct a detailed inquiry to unravel the truth behind the transaction. However, the AO made a superficial inquiry, necessitating the PCIT's intervention. The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the assessee's appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.