Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Key legal principles and decisions related to various disallowances and additions made by the Assessing Officer (AO) under different sections of the Income Tax Act. The critical points covered are: Cessation of liability u/s 41(1): The onus is on the AO to provide concrete evidence for cessation or remission of liability. Non-payment over time or time-barred debts do not automatically constitute cessation. Clear and specific evidence is required. Disallowance u/s 37(1): Disallowances should be made only when there is clear evidence that the expenditure is not for business purposes. Ad hoc disallowances without substantial evidence are arbitrary and unjustified. Assessee's documentation and audited financial statements demonstrating genuineness of expenses should be considered. Disallowance of personal expenses: Disallowances cannot be based on assumptions or lack of evidence of personal use. Assessee's demonstration of business purpose and tax auditor's acceptance should be considered. Interest disallowance u/s 36(1)(iii): The principle of fungibility of funds should be applied. If the assessee had sufficient interest-free funds to cover the loan, interest deduction should be allowed for loans advanced for commercial expediency. Disallowance u/s 14A read with Rule 8D.
Key legal principles and decisions related to various disallowances and additions made by the Assessing Officer (AO) under different sections of the Income Tax Act. The critical points covered are: Cessation of liability u/s 41(1): The onus is on the AO to provide concrete evidence for cessation or remission of liability. Non-payment over time or time-barred debts do not automatically constitute cessation. Clear and specific evidence is required. Disallowance u/s 37(1): Disallowances should be made only when there is clear evidence that the expenditure is not for business purposes. Ad hoc disallowances without substantial evidence are arbitrary and unjustified. Assessee's documentation and audited financial statements demonstrating genuineness of expenses should be considered. Disallowance of personal expenses: Disallowances cannot be based on assumptions or lack of evidence of personal use. Assessee's demonstration of business purpose and tax auditor's acceptance should be considered. Interest disallowance u/s 36(1)(iii): The principle of fungibility of funds should be applied. If the assessee had sufficient interest-free funds to cover the loan, interest deduction should be allowed for loans advanced for commercial expediency. Disallowance u/s 14A read with Rule 8D.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.