Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Key legal principles and decisions related to various disallowances and additions made by the Assessing Officer (AO) under different sections of the Income Tax Act. The critical points covered are: Cessation of liability u/s 41(1): The onus is on the AO to provide concrete evidence for cessation or remission of liability. Non-payment over time or time-barred debts do not automatically constitute cessation. Clear and specific evidence is required. Disallowance u/s 37(1): Disallowances should be made only when there is clear evidence that the expenditure is not for business purposes. Ad hoc disallowances without substantial evidence are arbitrary and unjustified. Assessee's documentation and audited financial statements demonstrating genuineness of expenses should be considered. Disallowance of personal expenses: Disallowances cannot be based on assumptions or lack of evidence of personal use. Assessee's demonstration of business purpose and tax auditor's acceptance should be considered. Interest disallowance u/s 36(1)(iii): The principle of fungibility of funds should be applied. If the assessee had sufficient interest-free funds to cover the loan, interest deduction should be allowed for loans advanced for commercial expediency. Disallowance u/s 14A read with Rule 8D.
Key legal principles and decisions related to various disallowances and additions made by the Assessing Officer (AO) under different sections of the Income Tax Act. The critical points covered are: Cessation of liability u/s 41(1): The onus is on the AO to provide concrete evidence for cessation or remission of liability. Non-payment over time or time-barred debts do not automatically constitute cessation. Clear and specific evidence is required. Disallowance u/s 37(1): Disallowances should be made only when there is clear evidence that the expenditure is not for business purposes. Ad hoc disallowances without substantial evidence are arbitrary and unjustified. Assessee's documentation and audited financial statements demonstrating genuineness of expenses should be considered. Disallowance of personal expenses: Disallowances cannot be based on assumptions or lack of evidence of personal use. Assessee's demonstration of business purpose and tax auditor's acceptance should be considered. Interest disallowance u/s 36(1)(iii): The principle of fungibility of funds should be applied. If the assessee had sufficient interest-free funds to cover the loan, interest deduction should be allowed for loans advanced for commercial expediency. Disallowance u/s 14A read with Rule 8D.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
