Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Insolvency and BankruptcySeptember 7, 2024Case LawsAT
The Corporate Debtor denied the existence of a loan agreement with 12% interest, as claimed by the Financial Creditor in the Section 7 application. To qualify as a Financial Debt u/s 5(8) of the IBC, the transaction must involve disbursal for time value of money. The Supreme Court in Anuj Jain vs. Axis Bank held that transactions u/s 5(8) clauses must contain the essential element of the principal clause or features traceable to it. In this case, the transfer of funds by the Financial Creditor to the Corporate Debtor was between family companies, not a loan or disbursal for time value of money. The Adjudicating Authority erred in admitting the Section 7 application without examining the nature of the transaction and the disputed loan letter. The essential element of disbursal for time value of money was not proved, so the debt cannot be treated as a Financial Debt. However, since the Corporate Debtor admitted owing Rs. 1,22,50,000 and handed over a draft, the Financial Creditor is allowed to retain the amount, despite offering to return it. The appeal is allowed.
The Corporate Debtor denied the existence of a loan agreement with 12% interest, as claimed by the Financial Creditor in the Section 7 application. To qualify as a Financial Debt u/s 5(8) of the IBC, the transaction must involve disbursal for time value of money. The Supreme Court in Anuj Jain vs. Axis Bank held that transactions u/s 5(8) clauses must contain the essential element of the principal clause or features traceable to it. In this case, the transfer of funds by the Financial Creditor to the Corporate Debtor was between family companies, not a loan or disbursal for time value of money. The Adjudicating Authority erred in admitting the Section 7 application without examining the nature of the transaction and the disputed loan letter. The essential element of disbursal for time value of money was not proved, so the debt cannot be treated as a Financial Debt. However, since the Corporate Debtor admitted owing Rs. 1,22,50,000 and handed over a draft, the Financial Creditor is allowed to retain the amount, despite offering to return it. The appeal is allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
