Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Customs-controlled container movement now extends to DP World facilities, subject to segregation, inspections, reconciliation, and EXIM cargo priority...
The High Court upheld the validity of the Assessing Officer's jurisdiction to frame the assessment order u/s 144. Even if the case was not liable for compulsory scrutiny per CBDT guidelines, it fell within Section 143(2) allowing the AO to issue notice and proceed with assessment u/s 144 if income had escaped assessment. The AO's power u/s 143(2) is statutory and cannot be curtailed by CBDT instructions, as that would require the AO to dispose of a case in a manner not prescribed by statute. The ITAT order upholding the assessment u/s 144 was found to have no illegality or infirmity.
The High Court upheld the validity of the Assessing Officer's jurisdiction to frame the assessment order u/s 144. Even if the case was not liable for compulsory scrutiny per CBDT guidelines, it fell within Section 143(2) allowing the AO to issue notice and proceed with assessment u/s 144 if income had escaped assessment. The AO's power u/s 143(2) is statutory and cannot be curtailed by CBDT instructions, as that would require the AO to dispose of a case in a manner not prescribed by statute. The ITAT order upholding the assessment u/s 144 was found to have no illegality or infirmity.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4827 
Join Channel 
