Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The assessee claimed deduction of brokerage expenses u/s 57(iii) against income from other sources. The Assessing Officer disallowed part of the expenses in proportion to the principal and interest received from the builder. The Tribunal held that section 57(iii) allows deduction of expenses wholly and exclusively incurred for earning such income, without enabling the Assessing Officer to estimate and disallow a portion. The expenditure was incurred to recover the entire amount, including principal and interest, from the builder through brokers. The interest component was offered as income, and the related expenses were wholly deductible. The Tribunal allowed the ground, stating that the expenditure had a direct connection with earning the income and was incurred for that purpose, as required u/s 57(iii) read with judicial precedents. The implication is narrower than section 37(1) for business expenses but requires a nexus between the expenditure and income earning.
The assessee claimed deduction of brokerage expenses u/s 57(iii) against income from other sources. The Assessing Officer disallowed part of the expenses in proportion to the principal and interest received from the builder. The Tribunal held that section 57(iii) allows deduction of expenses wholly and exclusively incurred for earning such income, without enabling the Assessing Officer to estimate and disallow a portion. The expenditure was incurred to recover the entire amount, including principal and interest, from the builder through brokers. The interest component was offered as income, and the related expenses were wholly deductible. The Tribunal allowed the ground, stating that the expenditure had a direct connection with earning the income and was incurred for that purpose, as required u/s 57(iii) read with judicial precedents. The implication is narrower than section 37(1) for business expenses but requires a nexus between the expenditure and income earning.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.