Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Loss due to robbery of gold ornaments is allowable as a deduction if it arises from carrying on business and is incidental to it. The CIT(A) erred in restricting the loss based on newspaper reports instead of the books of account. The loss from embezzlement, theft, or robbery is deductible if it has a proximate connection to the business. The assessee submitted police reports, FIR, and newspaper clippings as evidence of the robbery. The revenue's argument that no quantitative details were provided in the FIR is not acceptable. The assessee's appeal is allowed, and the loss suffered due to robbery is allowed as a deduction.
Loss due to robbery of gold ornaments is allowable as a deduction if it arises from carrying on business and is incidental to it. The CIT(A) erred in restricting the loss based on newspaper reports instead of the books of account. The loss from embezzlement, theft, or robbery is deductible if it has a proximate connection to the business. The assessee submitted police reports, FIR, and newspaper clippings as evidence of the robbery. The revenue's argument that no quantitative details were provided in the FIR is not acceptable. The assessee's appeal is allowed, and the loss suffered due to robbery is allowed as a deduction.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.