Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Page of 4801
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
341 to 360 of 96001 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The High Court set aside the impugned assessment order that disallowed Input Tax Credit solely on the ground of delay u/s 16(4) of the GST Acts. The Court directed the assessing authority to re-do the assessment considering the amendment and reconsider the petitioner's submissions on three other issues: ineligibility u/s 17(5), ineligible ITC declaration, and excess ITC claimed due to outward supplies not supported by E-way bills and discrepancies between GSTR-9 and GSTR-1. The petitioner was granted four weeks to file objections on all issues, including Section 16(4). The petition was disposed of accordingly.
The High Court set aside the impugned assessment order that disallowed Input Tax Credit solely on the ground of delay u/s 16(4) of the GST Acts. The Court directed the assessing authority to re-do the assessment considering the amendment and reconsider the petitioner's submissions on three other issues: ineligibility u/s 17(5), ineligible ITC declaration, and excess ITC claimed due to outward supplies not supported by E-way bills and discrepancies between GSTR-9 and GSTR-1. The petitioner was granted four weeks to file objections on all issues, including Section 16(4). The petition was disposed of accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4801
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
