Retrospective cancellation of charitable registration under section 12AB(4) was unsustainable; related-party benefit allegations did not prove nongenu...
Merger control notice and disclosure rules: Supreme Court limits penalties, rejects reopening of approved combination, and sets aside adverse findings...
The petitioner paid Integrated Goods and Services Tax (IGST) of Rs. 85,70,105/- on imported goods, which was not disputed. The petitioner availed Input Tax Credit of the paid IGST as permissible under the SGST Act. While filing GSTR-2A returns, the petitioner reflected the IGST details, but inadvertently omitted to include the same in GSTR-3B returns for July, August, September, and October 2017. The High Court set aside the impugned order, subject to conditions, upon the Special Government Pleader's submission that if relevant Bill of Entries are submitted, the authorities will consider the same.
The petitioner paid Integrated Goods and Services Tax (IGST) of Rs. 85,70,105/- on imported goods, which was not disputed. The petitioner availed Input Tax Credit of the paid IGST as permissible under the SGST Act. While filing GSTR-2A returns, the petitioner reflected the IGST details, but inadvertently omitted to include the same in GSTR-3B returns for July, August, September, and October 2017. The High Court set aside the impugned order, subject to conditions, upon the Special Government Pleader's submission that if relevant Bill of Entries are submitted, the authorities will consider the same.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
