Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The doctrine of res judicata prevents parties from relitigating issues already conclusively determined by a court. However, in cases involving larger public interest, a flexible approach should be adopted. Suppression of material facts by appellants that could influence the merits of the case warrants dismissal. The doctrine of merger should not be applied mechanically in cases involving public infrastructure projects, as it may lead to irreversible consequences. The court invoked its extraordinary power under Article 142 to ensure complete justice between landowners, the state, and the public's vested interest in infrastructure projects. Subsequent purchasers lack locus standi to contest acquisitions or claim lapse of proceedings u/s 24(2) of the 2013 Act, overruling a previous decision. The petition was disposed of accordingly.
The doctrine of res judicata prevents parties from relitigating issues already conclusively determined by a court. However, in cases involving larger public interest, a flexible approach should be adopted. Suppression of material facts by appellants that could influence the merits of the case warrants dismissal. The doctrine of merger should not be applied mechanically in cases involving public infrastructure projects, as it may lead to irreversible consequences. The court invoked its extraordinary power under Article 142 to ensure complete justice between landowners, the state, and the public's vested interest in infrastructure projects. Subsequent purchasers lack locus standi to contest acquisitions or claim lapse of proceedings u/s 24(2) of the 2013 Act, overruling a previous decision. The petition was disposed of accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
