Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The Supreme Court held that service tax cannot be levied on the promotion or marketing of lotteries as "business auxiliary services" u/s 65(19)(ii) of the Finance Act, 1994. Lottery tickets are actionable claims and do not qualify as "goods" under the Sale of Goods Act, 1930, which is incorporated in the Finance Act's definition. Conducting lotteries is a revenue-generating activity by the State, not a service rendered to clients. The Explanation introduced to Section 65(19)(ii) cannot bring an activity within its scope if it is not covered by the main provision. Selling lottery tickets is not a service related to promoting or marketing a service provided by the client (State). The High Courts erred in interpreting lotteries as goods and overlooked that selling lottery tickets is a privileged activity by the State, not a service for which promotion or marketing services are rendered.
The Supreme Court held that service tax cannot be levied on the promotion or marketing of lotteries as "business auxiliary services" u/s 65(19)(ii) of the Finance Act, 1994. Lottery tickets are actionable claims and do not qualify as "goods" under the Sale of Goods Act, 1930, which is incorporated in the Finance Act's definition. Conducting lotteries is a revenue-generating activity by the State, not a service rendered to clients. The Explanation introduced to Section 65(19)(ii) cannot bring an activity within its scope if it is not covered by the main provision. Selling lottery tickets is not a service related to promoting or marketing a service provided by the client (State). The High Courts erred in interpreting lotteries as goods and overlooked that selling lottery tickets is a privileged activity by the State, not a service for which promotion or marketing services are rendered.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.