Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Page of 4813
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3301 to 3320 of 96257 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
This case involves a challenge to a garnish order issued by tax authorities for recovering income tax and penalties. The High Court, considering the Supreme Court's order, disposed of the petition with directions to the revenue authorities. They must decide the application for waiver of pre-deposit and urgent hearing within one month, passing a reasoned order. Until then, no coercive action can be taken against the petitioner. Additionally, since the appeal is pending for over a year, the authorities must decide it expeditiously, preferably within three months, without further delay.
This case involves a challenge to a garnish order issued by tax authorities for recovering income tax and penalties. The High Court, considering the Supreme Court's order, disposed of the petition with directions to the revenue authorities. They must decide the application for waiver of pre-deposit and urgent hearing within one month, passing a reasoned order. Until then, no coercive action can be taken against the petitioner. Additionally, since the appeal is pending for over a year, the authorities must decide it expeditiously, preferably within three months, without further delay.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4813 
Join Channel 
