Retrospective cancellation of charitable registration under section 12AB(4) was unsustainable; related-party benefit allegations did not prove nongenu...
Merger control notice and disclosure rules: Supreme Court limits penalties, rejects reopening of approved combination, and sets aside adverse findings...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
2701 to 2720 of 96100 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
This case involves a challenge to a garnish order issued by tax authorities for recovering income tax and penalties. The High Court, considering the Supreme Court's order, disposed of the petition with directions to the revenue authorities. They must decide the application for waiver of pre-deposit and urgent hearing within one month, passing a reasoned order. Until then, no coercive action can be taken against the petitioner. Additionally, since the appeal is pending for over a year, the authorities must decide it expeditiously, preferably within three months, without further delay.
This case involves a challenge to a garnish order issued by tax authorities for recovering income tax and penalties. The High Court, considering the Supreme Court's order, disposed of the petition with directions to the revenue authorities. They must decide the application for waiver of pre-deposit and urgent hearing within one month, passing a reasoned order. Until then, no coercive action can be taken against the petitioner. Additionally, since the appeal is pending for over a year, the authorities must decide it expeditiously, preferably within three months, without further delay.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
