Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Customs Cargo Service Provider appointment extends custodianship to additional terminal land, subject to cargo-control, security and licence condition...
Contravention of Sections 8(1), 8(3), 8(4) read with Section 64(2) of the Foreign Exchange Regulations Act, 1973 involving export of consignment from India to Singapore and its re-export at a significantly higher value. The mastermind arranged for import and export of the same machinery through financial institutions by over-invoicing, resulting in substantial release of foreign exchange in contravention of the Act. Despite allegations against financial institutions, their involvement was not proven. The Appellate Tribunal found gross violation of the provisions and dismissed the appeals, holding the mastermind responsible for obtaining foreign exchange through over-invoicing and engaging financial institutions.
Contravention of Sections 8(1), 8(3), 8(4) read with Section 64(2) of the Foreign Exchange Regulations Act, 1973 involving export of consignment from India to Singapore and its re-export at a significantly higher value. The mastermind arranged for import and export of the same machinery through financial institutions by over-invoicing, resulting in substantial release of foreign exchange in contravention of the Act. Despite allegations against financial institutions, their involvement was not proven. The Appellate Tribunal found gross violation of the provisions and dismissed the appeals, holding the mastermind responsible for obtaining foreign exchange through over-invoicing and engaging financial institutions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4788
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
