Pre-enactment land-sale agreements escape stamp-duty value substitution where substantial banking-channel consideration was received before Section 43...
Customs valuation and classification require comparable evidence and assessment of imported goods in their actual condition, invalidating related pena...
Contravention of Sections 8(1), 8(3), 8(4) read with Section 64(2) of the Foreign Exchange Regulations Act, 1973 involving export of consignment from India to Singapore and its re-export at a significantly higher value. The mastermind arranged for import and export of the same machinery through financial institutions by over-invoicing, resulting in substantial release of foreign exchange in contravention of the Act. Despite allegations against financial institutions, their involvement was not proven. The Appellate Tribunal found gross violation of the provisions and dismissed the appeals, holding the mastermind responsible for obtaining foreign exchange through over-invoicing and engaging financial institutions.
Contravention of Sections 8(1), 8(3), 8(4) read with Section 64(2) of the Foreign Exchange Regulations Act, 1973 involving export of consignment from India to Singapore and its re-export at a significantly higher value. The mastermind arranged for import and export of the same machinery through financial institutions by over-invoicing, resulting in substantial release of foreign exchange in contravention of the Act. Despite allegations against financial institutions, their involvement was not proven. The Appellate Tribunal found gross violation of the provisions and dismissed the appeals, holding the mastermind responsible for obtaining foreign exchange through over-invoicing and engaging financial institutions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4786
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
