Arrest safeguards and transit remand requirements invalidated detention following inter-State transfer without communicated grounds or magistrate auth...
Arrest safeguards require disclosed grounds, relative intimation and transit remand, while duplicate prosecution under the CGST framework is unsustain...
Document Identification Number defects can invalidate GST assessments, with delayed challenges entertained conditionally where patent irregularities e...
Windmill commissioning evidence supported higher depreciation where grid connection and electricity generation proved operational use before the relev...
Pharmaceutical promotion and transfer-pricing comparability principles limited disallowances, while uncorroborated search allegations and unsupported ...
Business expenditure substantiation supports scrap credits, statutory payments and expense claims, while depreciation requires proof of actual busines...
Formation of belief by the Assessing Officer that income has escaped assessment is the crux of the reopening provision. The reasons recorded must be based on tangible material, evident from the reading of the reasons, constituting the mandatory requirement of Section 147. Assessments cannot be reopened merely on suspicion; the Assessing Officer must have "reason to believe" that income has escaped assessment, different from merely having a reason to suspect. In this case, there is no "close nexus" or "live link" between tangible material and the reason to believe income has escaped assessment. Information received from the Investigating Unit cannot be the sole basis; the Assessing Officer must take further steps, make inquiries, and gather material indicating income has escaped assessment before forming the belief. The Assessing Officer has not acquired any material to form such belief, lacking even a line of reason justifying the belief's formation. Consequently, the reopening does not satisfy the legal requirements of Sections 147 & 148. Thus, the reassessment proceedings are set aside, decided in favor of the assessee.
Formation of belief by the Assessing Officer that income has escaped assessment is the crux of the reopening provision. The reasons recorded must be based on tangible material, evident from the reading of the reasons, constituting the mandatory requirement of Section 147. Assessments cannot be reopened merely on suspicion; the Assessing Officer must have "reason to believe" that income has escaped assessment, different from merely having a reason to suspect. In this case, there is no "close nexus" or "live link" between tangible material and the reason to believe income has escaped assessment. Information received from the Investigating Unit cannot be the sole basis; the Assessing Officer must take further steps, make inquiries, and gather material indicating income has escaped assessment before forming the belief. The Assessing Officer has not acquired any material to form such belief, lacking even a line of reason justifying the belief's formation. Consequently, the reopening does not satisfy the legal requirements of Sections 147 & 148. Thus, the reassessment proceedings are set aside, decided in favor of the assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4790
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
