Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Mutual fund maturity rules require proper rollover, redemption, disclosure, and due diligence; investor gains cannot excuse regulatory breaches or pen...
Threshold exemption excludes exempt services, while stamp-paper purchases avoid reverse charge; consequential service tax penalties were also set asid...
Deduction u/s 35(2AB) for in-house Research and Development (R&D) expenses was disallowed as the assessee failed to properly explain the basis of claim and reconcile the difference between the amount claimed and the expenditure approved by the Department of Scientific and Industrial Research (DSIR). The matter was remitted to the Assessing Officer to correctly verify the eligible expenditure without considering the DSIR-approved amount. The disallowance of interest expenses u/s 36(1)(iii) was deleted as the assessee had sufficient interest-free funds available from reserves and share premium, contrary to the Assessing Officer's presumption that only interest-bearing funds were utilized towards capital work-in-progress (CWIP). The disallowance of capital loss was upheld as the assessee failed to reconcile the difference in CWIP additions, which cannot be considered an actual capital loss eligible for deduction. The disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia) for commission paid to non-residents was set aside for the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) to examine the merits, considering the assessee's contention that the non-residents rendered services outside India. The disallowance of provision for bad debts was upheld as the deduction u/s 36(1)(vii) requires the bad debt to be written off as.
Deduction u/s 35(2AB) for in-house Research and Development (R&D) expenses was disallowed as the assessee failed to properly explain the basis of claim and reconcile the difference between the amount claimed and the expenditure approved by the Department of Scientific and Industrial Research (DSIR). The matter was remitted to the Assessing Officer to correctly verify the eligible expenditure without considering the DSIR-approved amount. The disallowance of interest expenses u/s 36(1)(iii) was deleted as the assessee had sufficient interest-free funds available from reserves and share premium, contrary to the Assessing Officer's presumption that only interest-bearing funds were utilized towards capital work-in-progress (CWIP). The disallowance of capital loss was upheld as the assessee failed to reconcile the difference in CWIP additions, which cannot be considered an actual capital loss eligible for deduction. The disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia) for commission paid to non-residents was set aside for the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) to examine the merits, considering the assessee's contention that the non-residents rendered services outside India. The disallowance of provision for bad debts was upheld as the deduction u/s 36(1)(vii) requires the bad debt to be written off as.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
