Tax exemption for regulatory authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return filing...
Dispute Resolution Panel objections must reach both prescribed forums; otherwise assessment may proceed and statutory appeal remains the proper remedy...
Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
461 to 480 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
CENVAT Credit availed on manpower supply and housekeeping services received at unregistered job working units. Credit availed beyond six months from document date. Extended period invoked for demand, interest and penalty. Held: Input service definition construed widely, credit allowed on services consumed in unregistered premises as per jurisdictional High Court. Time limit u/r 4 not retrospective, credit allowed on invoices prior to September 2014 based on Delhi High Court ruling. No evidence of suppression, issues interpretational, extended period invoked incorrectly. Impugned orders set aside, appeal allowed.
CENVAT Credit availed on manpower supply and housekeeping services received at unregistered job working units. Credit availed beyond six months from document date. Extended period invoked for demand, interest and penalty. Held: Input service definition construed widely, credit allowed on services consumed in unregistered premises as per jurisdictional High Court. Time limit u/r 4 not retrospective, credit allowed on invoices prior to September 2014 based on Delhi High Court ruling. No evidence of suppression, issues interpretational, extended period invoked incorrectly. Impugned orders set aside, appeal allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.