Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Customs-controlled container movement now extends to DP World facilities, subject to segregation, inspections, reconciliation, and EXIM cargo priority...
Reassessment proceedings were initiated based on the belief that the assessee failed to disclose all material facts necessary for completing the assessment u/s 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Appellate Tribunal, being the ultimate fact-finding authority, upheld the Assessing Officer's decision to reopen the assessment, concluding that the assessee did not furnish the required information. The High Court held that no substantial question of law arises for consideration, as the Appellate Tribunal's factual findings cannot be disturbed u/s 260A, which is limited to substantial questions of law. The Appellate Tribunal's role as the ultimate fact-finding authority was affirmed.
Reassessment proceedings were initiated based on the belief that the assessee failed to disclose all material facts necessary for completing the assessment u/s 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Appellate Tribunal, being the ultimate fact-finding authority, upheld the Assessing Officer's decision to reopen the assessment, concluding that the assessee did not furnish the required information. The High Court held that no substantial question of law arises for consideration, as the Appellate Tribunal's factual findings cannot be disturbed u/s 260A, which is limited to substantial questions of law. The Appellate Tribunal's role as the ultimate fact-finding authority was affirmed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
