Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The assessee, a professional stock broker, claimed loss on trading of shares which was disallowed by the Assessing Officer (AO) on the grounds that the trades were not genuine business transactions, but part of accommodation entries to manipulate share prices. The Tribunal upheld the disallowance, observing that the assessee invested in shares of three companies with no financial standing, deliberately sold those shares incurring losses, and failed to provide any explanation for such transactions. The modus operandi unearthed by tax authorities, the assessee's knowledge as a stock broker, and involvement of penny stock companies pointed towards systematic booking of bogus losses. Relying on a precedent case, the Tribunal held that the assessee failed to prove genuineness of transactions, and the losses were arranged to convert unaccounted money. Regarding shares of Gujarat Meditech Ltd, the Tribunal noted limited trading and sellers, further substantiating the bogus nature of shares and disallowance of loss. Consequently, the assessee's appeal was dismissed.
The assessee, a professional stock broker, claimed loss on trading of shares which was disallowed by the Assessing Officer (AO) on the grounds that the trades were not genuine business transactions, but part of accommodation entries to manipulate share prices. The Tribunal upheld the disallowance, observing that the assessee invested in shares of three companies with no financial standing, deliberately sold those shares incurring losses, and failed to provide any explanation for such transactions. The modus operandi unearthed by tax authorities, the assessee's knowledge as a stock broker, and involvement of penny stock companies pointed towards systematic booking of bogus losses. Relying on a precedent case, the Tribunal held that the assessee failed to prove genuineness of transactions, and the losses were arranged to convert unaccounted money. Regarding shares of Gujarat Meditech Ltd, the Tribunal noted limited trading and sellers, further substantiating the bogus nature of shares and disallowance of loss. Consequently, the assessee's appeal was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.