Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The Tribunal held that the utilization of CENVAT credit of basic excise duty for payment of National Calamity Contingent Duty (NCCD) is permissible u/r 3 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. This issue is settled by various judgments, including the Tribunal's own decision in the case of C.C.E. & S.T. -SILVASA AND C.C.E. & S.T. -DAMAN VERSUS WELSPUN SYNTEX LTD AND M/S. WELLKNOWN POLYESTER LIMITED. The Tribunal distinguished the judgment in M/s. Unicorn Industries vs. UOI, which dealt with the nature of NCCD as a surcharge or excise duty, and held it to be irrelevant to the present issue. Consequently, the Tribunal upheld the respondent's utilization of CENVAT credit of basic excise duty for payment of NCCD and dismissed the Revenue's appeal.
The Tribunal held that the utilization of CENVAT credit of basic excise duty for payment of National Calamity Contingent Duty (NCCD) is permissible u/r 3 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. This issue is settled by various judgments, including the Tribunal's own decision in the case of C.C.E. & S.T. -SILVASA AND C.C.E. & S.T. -DAMAN VERSUS WELSPUN SYNTEX LTD AND M/S. WELLKNOWN POLYESTER LIMITED. The Tribunal distinguished the judgment in M/s. Unicorn Industries vs. UOI, which dealt with the nature of NCCD as a surcharge or excise duty, and held it to be irrelevant to the present issue. Consequently, the Tribunal upheld the respondent's utilization of CENVAT credit of basic excise duty for payment of NCCD and dismissed the Revenue's appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.