Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
Notification No. 56/2023 prima facie appears ultra vires Section 168A of CGST Act, 2017 due to lack of GST Council recommendation, rendering consequential actions based on it invalid. Court finds examination required regarding force majeure applicability based on 49th GST Council meeting minutes, granting respondent authorities opportunity to present stance and materials. Interim protection granted to petitioners against impugned assessment order dated 26.04.2024 with no coercive action permitted until next date. Respondents directed to file affidavits by 19.08.2024.
Notification No. 56/2023 prima facie appears ultra vires Section 168A of CGST Act, 2017 due to lack of GST Council recommendation, rendering consequential actions based on it invalid. Court finds examination required regarding force majeure applicability based on 49th GST Council meeting minutes, granting respondent authorities opportunity to present stance and materials. Interim protection granted to petitioners against impugned assessment order dated 26.04.2024 with no coercive action permitted until next date. Respondents directed to file affidavits by 19.08.2024.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.