Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Transfer pricing adjustment to international transactions - Non-satisfaction of conditions prescribed u/r 10B(4) for using multiple year data. Assessee required to perform Functional Asset and Risk (FAR) analysis for each year as factors of comparability may differ. Previous years' data cannot be extrapolated without establishing identical comparability factors. TP study report relying on previous two years' data without current year data rightly rejected. Comparables selection in manufacturing segment - Rejection of certain comparables upheld due to differences in product, raw material, related party transactions exceeding 25%, and impact of intangibles on margins. Remitted to TPO to examine export filter objection for one comparable. TP adjustment in ITES segment - Transactions not covered under MAP resolution substantial. Remitted to TPO/AO for FAR analysis of non-UK transactions to determine if pricing factors similar to UK transactions for adopting MAP price. Expenditure on jigs and fixtures treated as capital expenditure, not revenue, as providing long-term enduring benefit. Assessee's policy of writing off over two years upheld. Working capital adjustment - Remitted to TPO to verify and allow similar adjustment as previous years, if granted earlier.
Transfer pricing adjustment to international transactions - Non-satisfaction of conditions prescribed u/r 10B(4) for using multiple year data. Assessee required to perform Functional Asset and Risk (FAR) analysis for each year as factors of comparability may differ. Previous years' data cannot be extrapolated without establishing identical comparability factors. TP study report relying on previous two years' data without current year data rightly rejected. Comparables selection in manufacturing segment - Rejection of certain comparables upheld due to differences in product, raw material, related party transactions exceeding 25%, and impact of intangibles on margins. Remitted to TPO to examine export filter objection for one comparable. TP adjustment in ITES segment - Transactions not covered under MAP resolution substantial. Remitted to TPO/AO for FAR analysis of non-UK transactions to determine if pricing factors similar to UK transactions for adopting MAP price. Expenditure on jigs and fixtures treated as capital expenditure, not revenue, as providing long-term enduring benefit. Assessee's policy of writing off over two years upheld. Working capital adjustment - Remitted to TPO to verify and allow similar adjustment as previous years, if granted earlier.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.