Governmental authority status supports construction-service exemption, while pre-cutoff contract and stamp-duty compliance requires verification on re...
Automated Free Sale and Commerce Certificates enable paperless processing while retaining risk-based manual verification for selected exporter applica...
Employee stock-shortage penalties do not constitute consideration for services, preventing GST collection under Schedule II in employment relationship...
Assessee claimed higher cost of acquisition of shares during assessment proceedings, leading to lower capital gains computation. CIT(A) rejected the claim, relying on Goetze (India) Ltd. judgment. However, Karnataka High Court held that CIT(A) has power to consider fresh claims, even if not made in original/revised return. Matter restored to AO to examine assessee's entitlement to higher cost of acquisition of Rs. 184.09 per share after affording reasonable opportunity. Assessee's appeal allowed for statistical purposes. Relevant legal principles on appellate authorities' jurisdiction to entertain fresh claims and cost of acquisition determination discussed.
Assessee claimed higher cost of acquisition of shares during assessment proceedings, leading to lower capital gains computation. CIT(A) rejected the claim, relying on Goetze (India) Ltd. judgment. However, Karnataka High Court held that CIT(A) has power to consider fresh claims, even if not made in original/revised return. Matter restored to AO to examine assessee's entitlement to higher cost of acquisition of Rs. 184.09 per share after affording reasonable opportunity. Assessee's appeal allowed for statistical purposes. Relevant legal principles on appellate authorities' jurisdiction to entertain fresh claims and cost of acquisition determination discussed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
