Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Penalty u/s 272A(2)(g) was levied for not issuing TDS certificates in Form 16A to deductees on time. The issue pertained to the period of limitation for issuing the penalty notice. It was held that where the Assessing Officer initiates penalty proceedings in the assessment order, that date is the relevant date for reckoning limitation u/s 275(1)(c). In this case, the quantum proceedings were completed in December 2008, and the Assessing Officer initiated penalty proceedings then. Therefore, the last date for passing the penalty order was June 30, 2009. However, the penalty order was passed on September 29, 2009, beyond the prescribed time limit, rendering it barred by limitation. Additionally, on merits, the delay in issuing TDS certificates was linked to the delay in depositing TDS, for which the explanation was accepted. Consequently, the penalty u/s 272A(2)(g) was deleted.
Penalty u/s 272A(2)(g) was levied for not issuing TDS certificates in Form 16A to deductees on time. The issue pertained to the period of limitation for issuing the penalty notice. It was held that where the Assessing Officer initiates penalty proceedings in the assessment order, that date is the relevant date for reckoning limitation u/s 275(1)(c). In this case, the quantum proceedings were completed in December 2008, and the Assessing Officer initiated penalty proceedings then. Therefore, the last date for passing the penalty order was June 30, 2009. However, the penalty order was passed on September 29, 2009, beyond the prescribed time limit, rendering it barred by limitation. Additionally, on merits, the delay in issuing TDS certificates was linked to the delay in depositing TDS, for which the explanation was accepted. Consequently, the penalty u/s 272A(2)(g) was deleted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.