Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Penalty u/s 272A(2)(g) was levied for not issuing TDS certificates in Form 16A to deductees on time. The issue pertained to the period of limitation for issuing the penalty notice. It was held that where the Assessing Officer initiates penalty proceedings in the assessment order, that date is the relevant date for reckoning limitation u/s 275(1)(c). In this case, the quantum proceedings were completed in December 2008, and the Assessing Officer initiated penalty proceedings then. Therefore, the last date for passing the penalty order was June 30, 2009. However, the penalty order was passed on September 29, 2009, beyond the prescribed time limit, rendering it barred by limitation. Additionally, on merits, the delay in issuing TDS certificates was linked to the delay in depositing TDS, for which the explanation was accepted. Consequently, the penalty u/s 272A(2)(g) was deleted.
Penalty u/s 272A(2)(g) was levied for not issuing TDS certificates in Form 16A to deductees on time. The issue pertained to the period of limitation for issuing the penalty notice. It was held that where the Assessing Officer initiates penalty proceedings in the assessment order, that date is the relevant date for reckoning limitation u/s 275(1)(c). In this case, the quantum proceedings were completed in December 2008, and the Assessing Officer initiated penalty proceedings then. Therefore, the last date for passing the penalty order was June 30, 2009. However, the penalty order was passed on September 29, 2009, beyond the prescribed time limit, rendering it barred by limitation. Additionally, on merits, the delay in issuing TDS certificates was linked to the delay in depositing TDS, for which the explanation was accepted. Consequently, the penalty u/s 272A(2)(g) was deleted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.