Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The imported goods, calcite powder, were classified by the department as calcium carbonate under CTH 28365000, while the appellant declared it as calcite powder falling under CTH 25369030. The department's claim was based solely on the Customs Laboratory report of Kandla, which opined that the goods were calcium carbonate. However, classification under CTH 28365000 requires conformity with IS standards and parameters, which were not tested. Additionally, Board Circulars 03/2007-Cus and 15/2019-Cus endorsed that the Customs Laboratory, Kandla lacked the facility to test the imported goods. The decision in M/S. ASIAN GRANITO INDIA LIMITED VERSUS C.C. -MUNDRA held that test reports from ill-equipped laboratories cannot be accepted. Consequently, the department's claim of classification change based solely on the Kandla Laboratory report cannot be sustained. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed.
The imported goods, calcite powder, were classified by the department as calcium carbonate under CTH 28365000, while the appellant declared it as calcite powder falling under CTH 25369030. The department's claim was based solely on the Customs Laboratory report of Kandla, which opined that the goods were calcium carbonate. However, classification under CTH 28365000 requires conformity with IS standards and parameters, which were not tested. Additionally, Board Circulars 03/2007-Cus and 15/2019-Cus endorsed that the Customs Laboratory, Kandla lacked the facility to test the imported goods. The decision in M/S. ASIAN GRANITO INDIA LIMITED VERSUS C.C. -MUNDRA held that test reports from ill-equipped laboratories cannot be accepted. Consequently, the department's claim of classification change based solely on the Kandla Laboratory report cannot be sustained. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.