Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Insolvency and BankruptcySeptember 2, 2024Case LawsAT
This summary concerns the maintainability of a fresh application u/s 94 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. The appellant had filed an application u/s 94 in 2020, which was dismissed by the adjudicating authority on 01.02.2024 without granting liberty to file a fresh petition. The appellant claimed liberty to refile based on an order dated 28.02.2024, where the adjudicating authority permitted withdrawal of an IA with liberty to refile u/s 94(1). However, the adjudicating authority did not express any opinion on the maintainability of the fresh application. The NCLAT held that since no liberty was granted in the 01.02.2024 order, the adjudicating authority did not err in examining the maintainability of the fresh application filed on 29.02.2024. Consequently, the NCLAT dismissed the appeals challenging the adjudicating authority's order dated 17.05.2024, which had rejected the fresh application as unmaintainable.
This summary concerns the maintainability of a fresh application u/s 94 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. The appellant had filed an application u/s 94 in 2020, which was dismissed by the adjudicating authority on 01.02.2024 without granting liberty to file a fresh petition. The appellant claimed liberty to refile based on an order dated 28.02.2024, where the adjudicating authority permitted withdrawal of an IA with liberty to refile u/s 94(1). However, the adjudicating authority did not express any opinion on the maintainability of the fresh application. The NCLAT held that since no liberty was granted in the 01.02.2024 order, the adjudicating authority did not err in examining the maintainability of the fresh application filed on 29.02.2024. Consequently, the NCLAT dismissed the appeals challenging the adjudicating authority's order dated 17.05.2024, which had rejected the fresh application as unmaintainable.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.