Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Insolvency and BankruptcySeptember 2, 2024Case LawsAT
This summary concerns the maintainability of a fresh application u/s 94 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. The appellant had filed an application u/s 94 in 2020, which was dismissed by the adjudicating authority on 01.02.2024 without granting liberty to file a fresh petition. The appellant claimed liberty to refile based on an order dated 28.02.2024, where the adjudicating authority permitted withdrawal of an IA with liberty to refile u/s 94(1). However, the adjudicating authority did not express any opinion on the maintainability of the fresh application. The NCLAT held that since no liberty was granted in the 01.02.2024 order, the adjudicating authority did not err in examining the maintainability of the fresh application filed on 29.02.2024. Consequently, the NCLAT dismissed the appeals challenging the adjudicating authority's order dated 17.05.2024, which had rejected the fresh application as unmaintainable.
This summary concerns the maintainability of a fresh application u/s 94 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. The appellant had filed an application u/s 94 in 2020, which was dismissed by the adjudicating authority on 01.02.2024 without granting liberty to file a fresh petition. The appellant claimed liberty to refile based on an order dated 28.02.2024, where the adjudicating authority permitted withdrawal of an IA with liberty to refile u/s 94(1). However, the adjudicating authority did not express any opinion on the maintainability of the fresh application. The NCLAT held that since no liberty was granted in the 01.02.2024 order, the adjudicating authority did not err in examining the maintainability of the fresh application filed on 29.02.2024. Consequently, the NCLAT dismissed the appeals challenging the adjudicating authority's order dated 17.05.2024, which had rejected the fresh application as unmaintainable.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
