Purposive interpretation of residential house exemption: unregistered purchase agreement alone does not defeat relief, but investment must be verified...
Page of 4817
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3041 to 3060 of 96333 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The High Court held that the Show Cause Notice (SCN) demanding Integrated Goods and Services Tax (IGST) on the activity of holding equity capital by the Holding Companies in the Petitioner company and on the External Commercial Borrowing (ECB) received by the Petitioner from AOSH was not properly considered. The court quashed the SCN insofar as it relates to the proposal to levy/demand GST on 'Continuous Equity Share holding' and remitted the matter back to the respondent for reconsideration after providing an opportunity to the petitioner regarding the issue of 'Value of the Credit Grant in Service determined as a service fee @1%'. The petitioner was granted liberty to submit its response on this issue within four weeks.
The High Court held that the Show Cause Notice (SCN) demanding Integrated Goods and Services Tax (IGST) on the activity of holding equity capital by the Holding Companies in the Petitioner company and on the External Commercial Borrowing (ECB) received by the Petitioner from AOSH was not properly considered. The court quashed the SCN insofar as it relates to the proposal to levy/demand GST on 'Continuous Equity Share holding' and remitted the matter back to the respondent for reconsideration after providing an opportunity to the petitioner regarding the issue of 'Value of the Credit Grant in Service determined as a service fee @1%'. The petitioner was granted liberty to submit its response on this issue within four weeks.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
