Retrospective cancellation of charitable registration under section 12AB(4) was unsustainable; related-party benefit allegations did not prove nongenu...
Merger control notice and disclosure rules: Supreme Court limits penalties, rejects reopening of approved combination, and sets aside adverse findings...
The High Court held that the Show Cause Notice (SCN) demanding Integrated Goods and Services Tax (IGST) on the activity of holding equity capital by the Holding Companies in the Petitioner company and on the External Commercial Borrowing (ECB) received by the Petitioner from AOSH was not properly considered. The court quashed the SCN insofar as it relates to the proposal to levy/demand GST on 'Continuous Equity Share holding' and remitted the matter back to the respondent for reconsideration after providing an opportunity to the petitioner regarding the issue of 'Value of the Credit Grant in Service determined as a service fee @1%'. The petitioner was granted liberty to submit its response on this issue within four weeks.
The High Court held that the Show Cause Notice (SCN) demanding Integrated Goods and Services Tax (IGST) on the activity of holding equity capital by the Holding Companies in the Petitioner company and on the External Commercial Borrowing (ECB) received by the Petitioner from AOSH was not properly considered. The court quashed the SCN insofar as it relates to the proposal to levy/demand GST on 'Continuous Equity Share holding' and remitted the matter back to the respondent for reconsideration after providing an opportunity to the petitioner regarding the issue of 'Value of the Credit Grant in Service determined as a service fee @1%'. The petitioner was granted liberty to submit its response on this issue within four weeks.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
