Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Insolvency professional agency governance rules amended to add nominee directors, tighten independent director eligibility, and regulate managing dire...
The court granted bail to the accused in a case involving clandestine supply of branded TMT bars and evasion of GST. The prosecution's case was based solely on the statement of Rippan Kansal, with no incriminating evidence found during the search and inspection of the applicant's premises. The court considered the reliability of the statement and observed that the alleged offense is punishable with a maximum imprisonment of five years. Given the applicant's prolonged incarceration since 20.6.2024 without trial commencement, the court opined that the applicant made out a case for bail. The bail application was allowed, subject to fulfillment of conditions imposed by the court.
The court granted bail to the accused in a case involving clandestine supply of branded TMT bars and evasion of GST. The prosecution's case was based solely on the statement of Rippan Kansal, with no incriminating evidence found during the search and inspection of the applicant's premises. The court considered the reliability of the statement and observed that the alleged offense is punishable with a maximum imprisonment of five years. Given the applicant's prolonged incarceration since 20.6.2024 without trial commencement, the court opined that the applicant made out a case for bail. The bail application was allowed, subject to fulfillment of conditions imposed by the court.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.