Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
The case pertains to revocation of cancelled GST registration due to non-filing of returns for a continuous period exceeding twelve months. The petitioner cited the resurgence of the COVID-19 pandemic as the reason for not conducting business during that period. The High Court referred to the Suguna Cutpiece case, where GST registration was restored subject to certain terms and conditions. Following the precedent, the court directed restoration of the petitioner's GST registration, contingent upon fulfilling the stipulated conditions. The petition was disposed of accordingly.
The case pertains to revocation of cancelled GST registration due to non-filing of returns for a continuous period exceeding twelve months. The petitioner cited the resurgence of the COVID-19 pandemic as the reason for not conducting business during that period. The High Court referred to the Suguna Cutpiece case, where GST registration was restored subject to certain terms and conditions. Following the precedent, the court directed restoration of the petitioner's GST registration, contingent upon fulfilling the stipulated conditions. The petition was disposed of accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4798
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
